Anti-Calendar



9 surveys for I. Knezevic

SOCB42H: Classic Sociological Theory I
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 50
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 56.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 004222925185.33
Evaluations 000254022115.19
Organization 000223325185.41
Explanations 004152233255.63
Enthusiasm 040181836225.52
Teaching 000114018255.62
Workload 00450331144.61
Difficulty 00036362544.96
Value 000401115114.95
Retake Yes: 50.0%   No: 50.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students praised Professor Knezevicís ability to make material interesting, and noted her use of examples to make the course relevant. Suggestions included posting PowerPoint slides ahead of time and cutting down on the amount of readings.


SOCB46H: Social Class and Stratification I
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 48
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 70.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00033213965.18
Evaluations 00627392434.91
Organization 00393636155.52
Explanations 0099363965.24
Enthusiasm 003122433275.70
Teaching 000124135125.47
Workload 0036121964.55
Difficulty 0004147934.75
Value 001639231934.55
Retake Yes: 50.0%   No: 50.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Knezevic was noted as a knowledgeable Professor. Some students found it difficult to copy and listen at the same time and suggested that lecture notes be posted online.


SOCB47H: Social Class and Stratification II
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 82.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0007764216.00
Evaluations 700141436295.50
Organization 00001436506.36
Explanations 00072929365.93
Enthusiasm 0007050436.29
Teaching 00002121576.36
Workload 00057212104.64
Difficulty 00021641404.93
Value 000421725175.17
Retake Yes: 85.7%   No: 14.3%
calendar, timetable No Comments


SOCB56H: Sociology of Mass Media and Communications: Institutions, Technologies and Politics
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 74
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 60.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00213493325.20
Evaluations 00232481454.86
Organization 0004365645.60
Explanations 00273344135.60
Enthusiasm 00273329295.76
Teaching 00014325055.45
Workload 00273131104.33
Difficulty 0247613224.16
Value 30849231354.49
Retake Yes: 68.2%   No: 31.8%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students appreciated Knezevic's superior knowledge of the course material. Most agreed their experience was positive however some students noted they would like to see improvement in the structure of the midterm exam. Many noted the exam questions needed to be more specific. A few students also believed the readings were somewhat challenging.


SOCB57H: Sociology of Mass Media and Communications: Texts and Audiences
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 112
Session: Winter 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 58.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00019462785.24
Evaluations 02227422434.95
Organization 000152642185.63
Explanations 000133136205.62
Enthusiasm 000133517355.75
Teaching 00215393785.35
Workload 0026822534.40
Difficulty 0228115204.13
Value 0394822994.50
Retake Yes: 67.8%   No: 32.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Knezevic to be knowledgeable and enthusiastic, but despite her helpful mannerisms in class some found her distant and difficult to approach. Some commented that testing included some minor and trivial details from the course while others noted that the reading was particularly dry.


SOCC08H: Gender and Information Technology
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 29
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 82.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 5059304295.26
Evaluations 501313343404.78
Organization 000173830135.39
Explanations 009132530215.43
Enthusiasm 000133042135.57
Teaching 005173034135.35
Workload 00034342195.04
Difficulty 00042133495.09
Value 00513381395.11
Retake Yes: 52.6%   No: 47.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thought Professor Knezevic was an excellent instructor that used good examples to convey concepts and materials. Many students thought that the grading in the course was unfair, and the midterm exam was very confusing as it did not relate to the course work.


SOCC44H: Media and Society
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 22
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 59.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00002447316.08
Evaluations 00083131315.85
Organization 00016318475.85
Explanations 00016470395.62
Enthusiasm 00083924315.77
Teaching 00003931315.92
Workload 0007031004.31
Difficulty 0006239004.38
Value 00024248165.22
Retake Yes: 85.0%   No: 15.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found the material to be very interesting, and Professor Knezevic attended to studentsí questions clearly and precisely. However, many felt that the lectures were very detailed and found it difficult to try to listen to the lecture and record the information on the slides simultaneously.


SOCC44H: Media and Society
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 26
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 69.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00034283465.11
Evaluations 0063450664.72
Organization 000175017175.33
Explanations 000234523125.22
Enthusiasm 006172345125.39
Teaching 000282834125.28
Workload 00656231704.50
Difficulty 00045391704.72
Value 0064539004.38
Retake Yes: 68.8%   No: 31.3%
calendar, timetable No Comments


SOCC44H: Media and Society
Instructor: Knezevic, I. Course Enrollment: 20
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 65.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 08161647004.18
Evaluations 001624391604.58
Organization 0088393905.17
Explanations 0000394785.67
Enthusiasm 0008543105.25
Teaching 0002485485.50
Workload 00039243104.92
Difficulty 0003154084.83
Value 0003931004.44
Retake Yes: 54.0%   No: 46.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students found the lectures are excellent and interesting. However, the professor was too fast paced, didnít end class on time; students wish if the professor could provide the notes on the Intranet and make a clear explanation about assignments.


What do the numbers mean?