Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for M. Logue

FREA01H: Language Practice I
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 29
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 86.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00028363605.10
Evaluations 000282832125.30
Organization 0044444805.40
Explanations 04024481685.00
Enthusiasm 000202044165.60
Teaching 00016404045.30
Workload 4004840804.40
Difficulty 04126412804.40
Value 08204424404.00
Retake Yes: 91.0%   No: 8.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students were generally satisfied with this course, and a number of them commented that the class was more fun than they expected, and credited the instructor with keeping things light as well as educational.


FREA01H: Language Practice I
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 26
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 2 Percent Response: 81.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00023422845.10
Evaluations 001510254555.20
Organization 00438381444.80
Explanations 040193823145.20
Enthusiasm 0049947285.90
Teaching 009192333145.20
Workload 0045238404.40
Difficulty 009854004.00
Value 0094738404.00
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 19.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
No comments. (But see Lecture 01 of the same course, above).


FREA02H: Language Practice II
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 27
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 63.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00029471865.00
Evaluations 00635292464.88
Organization 00024413505.12
Explanations 00618532404.94
Enthusiasm 00024244765.35
Teaching 00018413565.29
Workload 0007612664.41
Difficulty 006826064.18
Value 060816064.13
Retake Yes: 88.2%   No: 11.8%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course were generally satisfied with the result but some concerns were expressed about the grading system that was not adequately explained and at times seemed arbitrary. The instructor was given credit for knowing his stuff, but students felt it could have been more effectively conveyed.


FREA02H: Language Practice II
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 25
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 2 Percent Response: 84.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0005435205.48
Evaluations 001015155555.30
Organization 000243329145.33
Explanations 000291433245.52
Enthusiasm 000102938245.76
Teaching 000141957105.62
Workload 50144333504.14
Difficulty 05194824504.05
Value 001438241954.62
Retake Yes: 90.0%   No: 10.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
No comments. (But see Lecture 01 of the same course, above).


FREA10Y: Language Practice I
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 19
Session: Summer 2002 Section: 3 Percent Response: 78.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 6066532604.69
Evaluations 60603340135.20
Organization 66013462604.56
Explanations 602026202604.26
Enthusiasm 0613202020204.91
Teaching 666202026134.63
Workload 006930003.90
Difficulty 00205320604.08
Value 002040300104.40
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thought that Logue really enjoyed teaching, but might want to try and learn new methods to help people that don't learn things in the traditional way.


FREA10Y: Language Practice I
Instructor: Logue, M. Course Enrollment: 14
Session: Summer 2002 Section: 4 Percent Response: 85.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00016165885.48
Evaluations 00016858165.64
Organization 0083305805.04
Explanations 080331625164.90
Enthusiasm 00025833335.69
Teaching 0016161633165.02
Workload 0016750803.96
Difficulty 8033580003.39
Value 00184518994.41
Retake Yes: 72.0%   No: 27.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Logue to be very fair and easy to meet with for extra help. Students felt that more notes on the material would be helpful.


What do the numbers mean?