Anti-Calendar



4 surveys for K. Henderson

CHMB16H: Techniques in Analytical Chemistry
Instructor: Henderson, K. Course Enrollment: 23
Session: Fall 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 87.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00022275005.23
Evaluations 00011414705.31
Organization 00016275505.29
Explanations 00027333805.01
Enthusiasm 00022443305.06
Teaching 00516166105.25
Workload 000262126265.47
Difficulty 00042262654.89
Value 0003550774.81
Retake Yes: 44.0%   No: 55.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


CHMB16H: Techniques in Analytical Chemistry
Instructor: Henderson, K. Course Enrollment: 42
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 1 Percent Response: 73.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 300162348105.40
Evaluations 30319392964.99
Organization 303161642195.41
Explanations 330131942195.41
Enthusiasm 77032343175.25
Teaching 300132345165.52
Workload 000331526265.45
Difficulty 004392918114.98
Value 44438232344.57
Retake Yes: 55.0%   No: 45.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students stated that Henderson was a good instructor who displayed high enthusiasm and knowledge. Criticisms included heavy material for a half course, overly stressful exams, and a delay in returning to the labs.


CHMB55H: Environmental Chemistry
Instructor: Henderson, K. Course Enrollment: 41
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 2 Percent Response: 61.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00033332944.99
Evaluations 081616252584.59
Organization 001225202744.26
Explanations 041216372544.71
Enthusiasm 04820253384.91
Teaching 00168372984.95
Workload 00041331684.81
Difficulty 00433292944.91
Value 50061111654.35
Retake Yes: 36.0%   No: 63.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The exams in this course were hard and long, and this course requires a good background in organic chemistry. Some students found that the lectures moved quickly, but also suggest the learning experience could be improved further if the instructor were to be a little more receptive to students' questions.


CHMB55H: Enviornmental Chemistry
Instructor: Henderson, K. Course Enrollment: 33
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 69.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00422303945.10
Evaluations 005144523145.32
Organization 400172630225.36
Explanations 050243324145.13
Enthusiasm 0013223022135.00
Teaching 00553343145.56
Workload 0057323004.22
Difficulty 0055927554.51
Value 060292918185.07
Retake Yes: 71.0%   No: 29.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students said the course was interesting, but felt that lecture notes posted on the web might have been helpful, since lecture moves fast and is difficult to copy notes down from.


What do the numbers mean?