Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for E. Mendelsohn

MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 105
Session: Fall 2002 Section: 2 Percent Response: 33.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 1821153312002.97
Evaluations 9189466903.40
Organization 41162993002.11
Explanations 2521211512302.68
Enthusiasm 181228286333.07
Teaching 252212299002.66
Workload 003313710174.97
Difficulty 300323516124.86
Value 14314487733.52
Retake Yes: 39.0%   No: 60.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students did not like the early lecture and found that it affects the level of enthusiasm for the class. Students suggest that the instructor structure and prepare the lecture better, so that the learning experience in the lecture is enhanced.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 119
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 2 Percent Response: 11.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 1401436714144.20
Evaluations 77729291474.36
Organization 2171421210143.64
Explanations 7141436140143.89
Enthusiasm 700212929145.08
Teaching 7141421217144.06
Workload 00757211404.38
Difficulty 00050291474.78
Value 01010501010104.30
Retake Yes: 70.0%   No: 30.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt that it was evident Mendelsohn was knowledgable. However, lectures were very difficult to follow.


MATC16H: Coding Theory and Cryptography
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 53.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0221122222204.11
Evaluations 002244022114.56
Organization 441133011002.22
Explanations 2525131325002.88
Enthusiasm 01111113311224.89
Teaching 11223311111103.22
Workload 0033670003.67
Difficulty 001144222204.56
Value 00011560335.56
Retake Yes: 87.5%   No: 12.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course had concerns with the tone of instruction and felt that greater moderation would benefit the classroom environment. While most found the course and the material to be valuable, as well as challenging, a more collegial atmosphere would have been beneficial.


MATC32H: Graph Theory and Algorithms for its Applications
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 7
Session: Fall 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 71.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00040402004.80
Evaluations 00020206005.40
Organization 02004040004.00
Explanations 020020402004.40
Enthusiasm 00020404005.20
Teaching 00040402004.80
Workload 00050250255.00
Difficulty 00025500255.25
Value 0006603304.62
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
It is important to keep up with the course material in this class. Students found the professor to be a good teacher.


MATC44H: Introduction to Combinatorics
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 13
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 31.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 252502500253.50
Evaluations 252502500253.50
Organization 50250000252.80
Explanations 50025000253.00
Enthusiasm 250250250254.00
Teaching 252525000253.20
Workload 00025502505.00
Difficulty 0000050506.50
Value 00250025505.80
Retake Yes: 25.0%   No: 75.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thought Mendelson could have better taught the course by organizing his lecture notes and being a bit more enthusiastic.


MATC44H: Introduction to Combinatorics
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 14
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 57.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 013038381304.50
Evaluations 0025133813134.86
Organization 025253813003.42
Explanations 003825132504.29
Enthusiasm 000251350135.56
Teaching 00133850004.41
Workload 00133805004.91
Difficulty 000382525135.18
Value 14005702904.16
Retake Yes: 29.0%   No: 71.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt lectures could have been organized better. Students also suggested that the instructor focus on making less mistakes on the chalkboard during lecture, it would enhance the learning process.


What do the numbers mean?