Anti-Calendar



28 surveys for N. Cheredeko

MATA20H: Calculus A
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 58
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 50.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000112152185.76
Evaluations 000111852215.83
Organization 00041142456.28
Explanations 00071445356.07
Enthusiasm 0007745426.21
Teaching 0007438496.32
Workload 000144525145.39
Difficulty 000143535145.50
Value 00425718115.11
Retake Yes: 54.0%   No: 46.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Some students felt the 2 hour lectures were too long and too early in the morning, and many expressed a desire for more time to be spent on examples in lecture.


MATA20H: Calculus A
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 61
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 70.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000103542145.60
Evaluations 00052856125.74
Organization 00372640265.79
Explanations 003121240355.93
Enthusiasm 005101945245.72
Teaching 0005352406.29
Workload 00040211274.82
Difficulty 003261419175.27
Value 30021171474.96
Retake Yes: 55.6%   No: 44.4%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 143
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 51.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 01482825335.71
Evaluations 003103326295.68
Organization 00342929355.89
Explanations 00772320435.86
Enthusiasm 03093027315.72
Teaching 001121828415.95
Workload 0010402713104.73
Difficulty 00634282294.94
Value 25538182584.72
Retake Yes: 65.6%   No: 34.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall students were pleased with Professor Cheredeko. Students found the Professor to be extremely helpful, and willing to address students questions and concerns. Many Students felt Professor Cheredeko to be extremely well organized and appreciated her use of examples. Overall Students agree that the course was beneficial and would recommend it.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 42
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 2 Percent Response: 64.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00002244336.11
Evaluations 00041141446.26
Organization 00041933446.19
Explanations 00442230416.00
Enthusiasm 00001148416.30
Teaching 00002630446.19
Workload 00048361604.68
Difficulty 00824442404.84
Value 05545321404.45
Retake Yes: 66.7%   No: 33.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall students were pleased with Professor Cheredeko. Students found the Professor to be extremely helpful, and willing to address students questions and concerns. Many Students felt Professor Cheredeko to be extremely well organized and appreciated her use of examples. Overall Students agree that the course was beneficial and would recommend it.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 148
Session: Winter 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 81.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002222926225.45
Evaluations 008182028255.43
Organization 003132322395.79
Explanations 002172325345.72
Enthusiasm 005162429275.56
Teaching 002113420335.71
Workload 00132392165.00
Difficulty 00431342654.99
Value 10738282164.76
Retake Yes: 69.8%   No: 30.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students appreciated the detailed notes and general organization of Professor Cheredeko. Several note that the board was difficult to read and a surprising number of computational errors crept in during class, making it hard to focus. There were a few complaints about the length and difficulty of tests.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 61
Session: Winter 2005 Section: 2 Percent Response: 86.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002113228265.66
Evaluations 002133623265.58
Organization 000123719335.73
Explanations 00293023365.81
Enthusiasm 002153626215.49
Teaching 00082330406.02
Workload 00632421464.82
Difficulty 002324014125.02
Value 02103636884.62
Retake Yes: 66.7%   No: 33.3%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 119
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000182742135.49
Evaluations 003162640165.50
Organization 00673038205.59
Explanations 003112936215.61
Enthusiasm 003103336195.57
Teaching 001112737235.69
Workload 00241441224.71
Difficulty 00337381564.85
Value 03533381834.72
Retake Yes: 59.0%   No: 41.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course were quite appreciative of Professor Cherededeko's lecture style and approach to instruction. Some commented that lectures tended to both start and end late, and this contributed to a sense of being rushed at times.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 110
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 2 Percent Response: 86.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 01294633105.36
Evaluations 025143533115.23
Organization 002101849215.78
Explanations 00192942195.70
Enthusiasm 014163234125.30
Teaching 00273246135.60
Workload 00338351944.83
Difficulty 00139322454.92
Value 03144281764.72
Retake Yes: 62.8%   No: 37.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt the instruction in this course was effective, with good use of examples. Some expressed concerns about the grading and requested more frequent use of bell curving.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I (Tutorial)
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 23
Session: Winter 2004 Tutorial: 04 Percent Response: 52.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0008335085.58
Evaluations 0008424285.50
Organization 001701742255.58
Explanations 0080335085.50
Enthusiasm 00084233175.58
Teaching 00081742336.00
Workload 0004536994.82
Difficulty 0093645904.55
Value 09036361804.55
Retake Yes: 83.3%   No: 16.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this tutorial appreciated the opportunity to get regular, hands-on help from a tutorial leader that was also their professor for the course. Some commented that the quizzes offered in the tutorial were a bit difficult, however, and especially requested that the contrast across tutorial sections be addressed. Some also felt that two hours of tutorial was a bit much to handle without a break.


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I (Tutorial)
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Winter 2004 Tutorial: 12 Percent Response: 100.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00003553125.76
Evaluations 0000355965.71
Organization 00061259246.00
Explanations 00001247416.29
Enthusiasm 00061229536.29
Teaching 00001841416.24
Workload 00029591204.82
Difficulty 0004147664.76
Value 00663191304.38
Retake Yes: 70.6%   No: 29.4%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATA23H: Linear Algebra I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 311
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 52.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00093338165.41
Evaluations 00162944185.62
Organization 00032637335.95
Explanations 00062437305.76
Enthusiasm 00052840235.61
Teaching 00062343245.65
Workload 01046341154.57
Difficulty 01246331134.44
Value 10337311784.71
Retake Yes: 73.0%   No: 26.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Knowledgeable, impressive, amazing, great, patient. These are just a few of the words students used to describe the teaching style of this professor. Students were also impressed with her ability to maintain class order.


MATA29Y: Introduction to Mathematical Modeling
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 101
Session: Summer 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 94.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0118443955.26
Evaluations 21213304185.14
Organization 021102151125.42
Explanations 10392050155.51
Enthusiasm 110112344185.52
Teaching 20071659145.62
Workload 00122531675.01
Difficulty 000203231165.38
Value 641138181194.18
Retake Yes: 33.0%   No: 66.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found that she was a good professor that always had a smile. In addition to attending to student's questions in a timely manner, she seemed to always be able to teach material that was relevant in assignments. Suggestions some students had included clearer writing on the chalkboard and more pre-solved problems.


MATA29Y: Introduction to Mathematical Modeling
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 100
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 93.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 106193428115.10
Evaluations 20714353395.15
Organization 038172933105.11
Explanations 0410152727155.00
Enthusiasm 052143532115.16
Teaching 13793037135.27
Workload 000353115195.18
Difficulty 002203424205.40
Value 7010431317104.46
Retake Yes: 36.0%   No: 64.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Cheredeko provided good examples in class and was patient in answering students' questions. Students wished Cheredeko would have been assertive with respect to controlling noisy class. Tutorial material was often commonly referred to as irrelevant.


MATA30H: Calculus I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 111
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 48.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000103430285.76
Evaluations 000102634305.85
Organization 00283628265.70
Explanations 002101938345.91
Enthusiasm 00203932285.83
Teaching 00002532456.20
Workload 000252826215.43
Difficulty 002212128305.63
Value 002151926125.41
Retake Yes: 39.6%   No: 60.4%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATA30H: Calculus I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 111
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 3 Percent Response: 59.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00725382575.00
Evaluations 004224120145.20
Organization 002193734105.31
Explanations 045222928145.15
Enthusiasm 225263123104.95
Teaching 000112058115.69
Workload 002173129175.45
Difficulty 202132232285.68
Value 042202214225.30
Retake Yes: 58.6%   No: 41.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, many students were pleased with Professor Cheredeko's method of teaching; they found that she presented material in an organized and well-structured manner. Nonetheless, some students felt that lectures were too fast-paced and that she should have provided more examples.


MATA30H: Calculus I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 150
Session: Fall 2007 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 65.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 234233323165.14
Evaluations 034173525185.31
Organization 023272829145.22
Explanations 203242631165.30
Enthusiasm 204232830155.26
Teaching 023121345265.80
Workload 000172825205.53
Difficulty 000152628235.65
Value 20722211494.88
Retake Yes: 54.9%   No: 45.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Most students appreciated that Professor Cheredeko used numerous examples to explain concepts. They also found that she was able to explain course materials well and in an organized manner. However, some students felt that the professor rushed through problems.


MATA35H: Calculus II for Biological Sciences
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 33
Session: Summer 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 93.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 300162626295.55
Evaluations 30062939235.65
Organization 303132919325.52
Explanations 300162332265.55
Enthusiasm 300163926165.29
Teaching 000102145245.83
Workload 30031387215.03
Difficulty 000313114245.31
Value 0714321811184.64
Retake Yes: 12.5%   No: 87.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students were quite pleased with the professor and her willingness and ability to help them along with the course material. Some students stress that course material still requires significant independent study.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 72
Session: Summer 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 80.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00094140105.52
Evaluations 000123634175.57
Organization 00272647195.74
Explanations 000104031195.59
Enthusiasm 000173133195.53
Teaching 000112539265.81
Workload 00055281164.68
Difficulty 00044351844.82
Value 02047311824.69
Retake Yes: 58.7%   No: 41.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students were pleased with the clear and applicable examples in this course and with Professor Cheredeko's instruction generally.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 96
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 84.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00073540165.70
Evaluations 00182947125.60
Organization 00022541306.00
Explanations 00062641255.90
Enthusiasm 00072146245.90
Teaching 00062644225.80
Workload 00027382395.20
Difficulty 000253028155.40
Value 015232923165.20
Retake Yes: 51.0%   No: 48.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Cheredeko did not have a single bad comment regarding her teaching style, organization of the course, and willingness to help. A lot of students thought she is the best professor they have ever had. The course itself is hard, but the weekly quizzes and assignments helped a lot. Two hour tutorials were very long, but helped most of the students in understanding the material.


MATB44H: Differential Equations I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 51
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 76.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00063436265.82
Evaluations 00002639366.10
Organization 00063426345.89
Explanations 00063142245.82
Enthusiasm 00033442245.85
Teaching 00002436426.18
Workload 00834291834.71
Difficulty 00631312404.80
Value 00326181364.88
Retake Yes: 89.0%   No: 11.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATB44H: Differential Equations I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 51
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 98.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00083432205.68
Evaluations 00022244245.98
Organization 000102242205.77
Explanations 00083824245.68
Enthusiasm 000152634205.64
Teaching 00021646306.11
Workload 00029461024.84
Difficulty 00224381844.98
Value 0003026604.61
Retake Yes: 65.9%   No: 34.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students commended Professor Cheredeko for effectively communicating the course material. However, many felt that she could have chosen a more fitting textbook.


MATB44H: Differential Equations I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 51
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 86.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00252739275.84
Evaluations 00091141396.09
Organization 002141123506.05
Explanations 00271425526.18
Enthusiasm 00021643396.18
Teaching 0007727596.39
Workload 00232431854.91
Difficulty 00218433255.18
Value 75536261924.36
Retake Yes: 75.0%   No: 25.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students commented that Professor Cheredeko's lectures were well organized and provided sufficient understanding of the course material. The course textbook, however, was not rated very useful by most students. The majority of students enjoyed the courses' structure and organization but commented that there was an excessive amount of material and that a tutorial would be beneficial.


MATB44H: Differential Equations I
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 61
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 85.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000194621135.29
Evaluations 026173131135.23
Organization 026132337195.44
Explanations 202212933135.27
Enthusiasm 004153533135.37
Teaching 002133535155.48
Workload 000263326155.30
Difficulty 002233619195.30
Value 0519331714124.52
Retake Yes: 65.9%   No: 34.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Cheredeko to be an excellent instructor and greatly appreciated her very well organized lectures. They found her to be very approachable for extra help. They also found the midterm to be way too hard.


MATC46H: Differential Equations II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 37
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 83.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000102339305.87
Evaluations 00002642336.06
Organization 00042339366.06
Explanations 00043330365.97
Enthusiasm 00042339366.06
Teaching 00002333466.23
Workload 00433392044.87
Difficulty 00020462675.20
Value 004203013175.24
Retake Yes: 62.1%   No: 37.9%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATC46H: Differential Equations II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 32
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 81.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00042739315.96
Evaluations 00082043315.96
Organization 00043135275.88
Explanations 000123135245.69
Enthusiasm 00482439275.77
Teaching 00001247436.31
Workload 00043272744.92
Difficulty 000244324125.23
Value 00020271645.06
Retake Yes: 68.0%   No: 32.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students agreed that the course was good and that they were happy to have taken it, but many also commented on the high level of difficulty of the material. However, they said that the professor did a good job in making it as easy as possible to understand, but they would have appreciated more examples.


MATC46H: Differential Equations II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 29
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 83.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00022353595.30
Evaluations 004133329215.50
Organization 000213321255.50
Explanations 004172635175.43
Enthusiasm 000222630225.52
Teaching 000222222355.70
Workload 000321818325.50
Difficulty 000194314245.43
Value 005323218145.05
Retake Yes: 61.9%   No: 38.1%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATC82H: Mathematics for Teachers
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 16
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 100.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00703244195.69
Evaluations 00771350255.81
Organization 00001944386.19
Explanations 00003844195.81
Enthusiasm 00002550256.00
Teaching 00001357326.19
Workload 000382519135.07
Difficulty 001338133204.67
Value 00013383205.23
Retake Yes: 93.3%   No: 6.7%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATD61H: Introduction to Industrial Mathematics
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 11
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 109.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00001750346.17
Evaluations 0000950346.27
Organization 00002542256.00
Explanations 00001742426.25
Enthusiasm 00001750346.17
Teaching 0000934596.50
Workload 00093417345.82
Difficulty 00091725426.09
Value 0009925175.86
Retake Yes: 83.3%   No: 16.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students unanimously agreed that Professor Cheredeko was an engaging professor. She used a lot of examples, and ensured that all students understood what was going on in the classroom. Many students appreciated and enjoyed the experience.


What do the numbers mean?