Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for WSTC10

WSTC10H: Women and Development
Instructor: Nguyen, J. Course Enrollment: 48
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 72.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000151843205.73
Evaluations 00391840235.78
Organization 00391838265.81
Explanations 00392335235.72
Enthusiasm 000121823406.00
Teaching 000121238325.97
Workload 0006062634.70
Difficulty 00366151234.44
Value 300151823205.48
Retake Yes: 82.8%   No: 17.2%
calendar, timetable No Comments


WSTC10H: Women and Development
Instructor: Nguyen, J. Course Enrollment: 64
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 46.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00074430205.63
Evaluations 00073430305.83
Organization 000102737275.80
Explanations 000142437245.72
Enthusiasm 00004734205.73
Teaching 00044720275.72
Workload 00054172744.80
Difficulty 00057271404.55
Value 000241410105.12
Retake Yes: 85.2%   No: 14.8%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students conveyed that Professor Nguyen was an excellent professor who treated her students fairly.


WSTC10H: Women and Development
Instructor: Sayne, P. Course Enrollment: 86
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 67.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 28922269523.02
Evaluations 2914172112702.93
Organization 291629149302.67
Explanations 2112212314903.23
Enthusiasm 17792692494.09
Teaching 2511252112443.11
Workload 9317577333.74
Difficulty 5219589253.89
Value 62646821104.52
Retake Yes: 28.8%   No: 71.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
This class was run in an unorganized and unstructured manner, which frustrated many students. The Professor rarely taught and depended mainly on student presentations. When the Professor did teach she tended to stray off topic easily. The mid-term was entirely multiple choice, which students felt, was inappropriate and no feedback was given on work. This class is felt to need improvement from its current structure.


WSTC10H: Women and Development
Instructor: Sayne, P. Course Enrollment: 48
Session: Fall 2003 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 79.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 772123261303.90
Evaluations 221339261054.40
Organization 251323281874.60
Explanations 20183926754.30
Enthusiasm 005133139105.40
Teaching 071528232304.40
Workload 0016812003.90
Difficulty 0016755203.90
Value 0024837824.60
Retake Yes: 51.0%   No: 48.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students expressed dissatisfaction concerning the degree of explanation they received about the grading structure of the course. They felt that greater preparation and a clearer explanation of expectations would have helped their experience with this course.


WSTC10Y: Women and Development
Instructor: Sayne, P. Course Enrollment: 35
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 77.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 001926302244.71
Evaluations 00430303345.08
Organization 772219221944.15
Explanations 041133222644.67
Enthusiasm 000261926305.65
Teaching 071522193074.71
Workload 0486915404.07
Difficulty 40196215003.84
Value 100104525554.10
Retake Yes: 64.0%   No: 36.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Sayne was an enthusiastic and understanding instructor. The course had a lack of lecture structure which proved to have a negative effect on students' enjoyment. The multitude of assignments were not handed back within a reasonable time.


WSTC10Y: Women and Development
Instructor: Sayne, P. Course Enrollment: 35
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 77.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 001926302244.70
Evaluations 00430303345.08
Organization 772219221944.15
Explanations 041133222644.67
Enthusiasm 000261926305.65
Teaching 071522193074.71
Workload 0486915404.07
Difficulty 40196215003.84
Value 100104525554.10
Retake Yes: 64.0%   No: 36.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Sayne was an enthusiastic and understanding instructor. The course had a lack of lecture structure which proved to have a negative effect on students' enjoyment. The multitude of assignments were not handed back within a reasonable time.


What do the numbers mean?