Anti-Calendar



3 surveys for PHLC51

PHLC51H: Symbolic Logic II
Instructor: Kremer, P. Course Enrollment: 7
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 85.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0000050506.50
Evaluations 0000067336.33
Organization 0000033676.67
Explanations 0000033676.67
Enthusiasm 0000033676.67
Teaching 0000067336.33
Workload 0008002004.40
Difficulty 000402020205.20
Value 000331717335.50
Retake Yes: 100.0%   No: 0.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The few comments received suggest that Professor Kremer was well appreciated by his students, who felt he invested considerable time and attention in this potentially difficult course.


PHLC51H: Symbolic Logic II
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 5
Session: Winter 2004 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 60.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0000067336.33
Evaluations 00003333336.00
Organization 0000330676.33
Explanations 0000330676.33
Enthusiasm 0000330676.33
Teaching 00003333336.00
Workload 0006700335.00
Difficulty 00033330335.33
Value 0003367004.67
Retake Yes: 66.7%   No: 33.3%
calendar, timetable No Comments


PHLC51H: Symbolic Logic II
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 10
Session: Winter 2003 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 70.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00001471145.94
Evaluations 00001457286.08
Organization 000141428425.88
Explanations 00042042145.18
Enthusiasm 00002828426.02
Teaching 00004214425.88
Workload 00144242004.20
Difficulty 000421428145.04
Value 000142842145.46
Retake Yes: 100.0%   No: 0.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thought that Sobel gave them great explanations of the concepts and found this class to be quite enjoyable and rewarding.


What do the numbers mean?