Anti-Calendar



7 surveys for PHLB50

PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Martel, I. Course Enrollment: 24
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 20.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00004020406.00
Evaluations 000202040205.60
Organization 00002040406.20
Explanations 00002040406.20
Enthusiasm 0000080206.20
Teaching 00002040406.20
Workload 00060202004.59
Difficulty 0008000204.59
Value 00040202004.75
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Shumelda, M. Course Enrollment: 52
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 50.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 808162420275.12
Evaluations 888122020274.92
Organization 804162035205.19
Explanations 840162724245.12
Enthusiasm 8012161235205.04
Teaching 808201627245.08
Workload 80824391684.62
Difficulty 4016351216204.73
Value 401620202444.59
Retake Yes: 62.5%   No: 37.5%
calendar, timetable No Comments


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 49
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 42.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 105010431554.56
Evaluations 555102929104.95
Organization 55515154354.95
Explanations 100510432054.68
Enthusiasm 1050153910154.68
Teaching 1005102039105.00
Workload 001039529104.89
Difficulty 001039102954.79
Value 5552952954.59
Retake Yes: 72.0%   No: 28.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Although students found Prof. Sobel to be nice and taught logic very well, ineffective communication lead to most of the class not showing up for lectures. Areas of improvement include correcting numerous mistakes in lecture notes, either extending time or reduce number of questions on the tests, and answering questions more appropriately.


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 37
Session: Fall 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 51.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 505112632215.32
Evaluations 110053226265.32
Organization 5016211626164.84
Explanations 552102632114.74
Enthusiasm 1155113716164.68
Teaching 555211626215.00
Workload 501647111654.26
Difficulty 011633113364.67
Value 066221128285.33
Retake Yes: 78.9%   No: 21.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Sobel was found to be very friendly, as well as very helpful towards his students.


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Kremer, P. Course Enrollment: 66
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 62.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002151737295.76
Evaluations 00351333486.17
Organization 007121737275.63
Explanations 005101044325.88
Enthusiasm 00010722616.34
Teaching 00331838406.10
Workload 301045231384.53
Difficulty 0513352810104.55
Value 6817538803.75
Retake Yes: 81.6%   No: 18.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students express a sense that the material covered in this course was naturally more difficult that it seemed in practice because Professor Kremer was so good at presenting it and making it accessible. A few students found the two hour lectures without any break were excessive. Several students commented that this course was useful even for students not in a philosophy program and were surprised by its applicability.


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 65
Session: Fall 2003 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 38.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000163632165.50
Evaluations 00082432366.00
Organization 00402436366.00
Explanations 008123224245.40
Enthusiasm 000163628205.50
Teaching 00044028285.80
Workload 0484721884.50
Difficulty 048292916124.80
Value 008252025205.20
Retake Yes: 65.0%   No: 34.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Reaction to this course was extremely varied. Some students were surprised by the mathematic content of logic and found the course either very dry or difficult. Other students appreciated Professor Sobel's organization, concise approach, and detailed notes as a means of approaching the content. Future students are advised to be aware of the nature of symbolic logic as a study, before enrolling in the course.


PHLB50H: Symbolic Logic I
Instructor: Sobel, J.H. Course Enrollment: 67
Session: Fall 2002 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 71.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 008252231125.04
Evaluations 004292233105.06
Organization 002202729205.35
Explanations 044164316144.93
Enthusiasm 066273910104.63
Teaching 002272727145.09
Workload 20859171204.19
Difficulty 004442514104.67
Value 251144221304.09
Retake Yes: 61.0%   No: 38.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Sobel interesting and organized. They found the material to be somewhat complicated and would have liked it to be broken down more.


What do the numbers mean?