Anti-Calendar



19 surveys for MGTD60

MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Harvey, L. Course Enrollment: 63
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 55.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 3003943406.12
Evaluations 30061538385.97
Organization 3003935496.21
Explanations 30362029385.82
Enthusiasm 03061832406.00
Teaching 30031846265.88
Workload 00318383295.26
Difficulty 00320353295.24
Value 000123232185.59
Retake Yes: 76.0%   No: 24.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Harvey was described as an excellent lecturer who was passionate about auditing. She replied to emails promptly and her lecture notes were well-organized. Students thought that she was very enthusiastic and truly wanted her students to learn and understand the class material. One suggestion students had for Professor Harvey was to try to keep the students engaged during lecture.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Harvey, L. Course Enrollment: 36
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 80.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000113535185.61
Evaluations 000142128355.86
Organization 000141438325.89
Explanations 000212128285.64
Enthusiasm 000112832285.79
Teaching 000142532255.70
Workload 40435252844.79
Difficulty 400282814255.21
Value 007183211145.09
Retake Yes: 37.0%   No: 63.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students felt that there wasn't sufficient help provided for the course. They wanted more office hours from the TA and professor, more examples to learn from, and for the teacher to speak slower. Besides that, they felt the professor did a great job.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: McFarland, G. Course Enrollment: 36
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 69.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000163629165.46
Evaluations 000201629325.75
Organization 000203224205.46
Explanations 000242020325.63
Enthusiasm 040203612245.29
Teaching 004162920245.48
Workload 40048162084.71
Difficulty 400293212205.08
Value 00416298205.32
Retake Yes: 37.5%   No: 62.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Unfortunately, sufficient comments were not available for this course.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Harvey, L. Course Enrollment: 52
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 88.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00054035205.71
Evaluations 000112744185.69
Organization 00072246245.89
Explanations 003112937205.62
Enthusiasm 00352044295.93
Teaching 00092248205.80
Workload 00027273795.29
Difficulty 000143335185.58
Value 005182422145.27
Retake Yes: 58.5%   No: 41.5%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Chana, H. Course Enrollment: 44
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 56.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 04024293285.13
Evaluations 00429362444.96
Organization 00024293685.29
Explanations 00812324045.21
Enthusiasm 000242032165.43
Teaching 00416324005.17
Workload 0008324885.58
Difficulty 00004040165.75
Value 00420243285.23
Retake Yes: 46.0%   No: 54.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students thought that Professor Lansche lectured in a very professional manner, and appreciated the interesting examples to enhance memorization of a concept. However, some students wished she would respond to email questions more often. One suggestion students have for Professor Lansche is to try to design exams more reflective of the course content.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Chana, H. Course Enrollment: 44
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 56.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 04024293285.13
Evaluations 00429362444.96
Organization 00024293685.29
Explanations 00812324045.21
Enthusiasm 000242032165.43
Teaching 00416324005.17
Workload 0008324885.58
Difficulty 00004040165.75
Value 00420243285.23
Retake Yes: 46.0%   No: 54.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students were dissatisfied with Professor Chana’s lecturing. Students sought more examples for cases, and more difficult and applicable examples. The biggest issue students had was that the exams were not designed for the undergraduate level and that they felt that a large gap existed between what was taught and what was tested. One suggestion students have for Professor Chana is to make the assignments worth more of the final grade.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 44
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 54.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00517344255.25
Evaluations 00917383095.13
Organization 00517254695.38
Explanations 00993438135.38
Enthusiasm 009133038135.33
Teaching 00517304655.29
Workload 0005424695.58
Difficulty 00004638175.71
Value 000212530135.38
Retake Yes: 42.0%   No: 58.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students thought that Professor Lansche lectured in a very professional manner, and appreciated the interesting examples to enhance memorization of a concept. However, some students wished she would respond to email questions more often. One suggestion students have for Professor Lansche is to try to design exams more reflective of the course content.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 44
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 54.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00517344255.25
Evaluations 00917383095.13
Organization 00517254695.38
Explanations 00993438135.38
Enthusiasm 009133038135.33
Teaching 00517304655.29
Workload 0005424695.58
Difficulty 00004638175.71
Value 000212530135.38
Retake Yes: 42.0%   No: 58.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students were dissatisfied with Professor Chana’s lecturing. Students sought more examples for cases, and more difficult and applicable examples. The biggest issue students had was that the exams were not designed for the undergraduate level and that they felt that a large gap existed between what was taught and what was tested. One suggestion students have for Professor Chana is to make the assignments worth more of the final grade.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 60
Session: Fall 2007 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 68.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 53832302504.51
Evaluations 551027322204.41
Organization 53827302734.63
Explanations 538252527104.80
Enthusiasm 501520272784.73
Teaching 531032301854.49
Workload 00552527405.90
Difficulty 00351527526.20
Value 51010151522104.51
Retake Yes: 26.8%   No: 73.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt that Professor Lansche was enthusiastic and knowledgeable, and they enjoyed her method of teaching based on case studies. However, some students would have preferred to examine more general cases. Moreover, students would have liked to see the professor make greater connections between her lectures and the course textbook. Also, some students commented that the exams did not reflect the course material.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Chana, H. Course Enrollment: 60
Session: Fall 2007 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 70.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 535222724104.85
Evaluations 838222720104.64
Organization 505123427125.10
Explanations 500222727105.05
Enthusiasm 508102922225.23
Teaching 50817223685.00
Workload 00082020486.15
Difficulty 00051224536.33
Value 5312172217104.63
Retake Yes: 26.3%   No: 73.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students commended Professor Chana's performance and enjoyed his method of teaching based on cases. However, some students felt that they were ill prepared for the course exams and that an excessive amount of material was covered in this class.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 42
Session: Winter 2007 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 78.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 001323432004.70
Evaluations 001327471304.60
Organization 001323471074.73
Explanations 001021451774.90
Enthusiasm 00323402775.10
Teaching 001030431074.73
Workload 000114329185.54
Difficulty 00073431285.79
Value 08082428325.60
Retake Yes: 34.6%   No: 65.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students commended Professor Lansche for doing a good job teaching. However, many noted that increased office hours and quicker response to student queries would have helped. More examples in class and detailed explanations on the topics covered would aid in better understanding of the material.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 68
Session: Fall 2006 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 104.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 181414411744.52
Evaluations 482420271344.11
Organization 441325351174.45
Explanations 34614442184.89
Enthusiasm 13417373085.07
Teaching 34720441474.70
Workload 001162930245.60
Difficulty 000142332315.80
Value 330143219295.42
Retake Yes: 31.3%   No: 68.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found this course to be challenging and lacking in organization and structure. Although students agreed that Professor Lansche displayed obvious enthusiasm for the subject, they felt that classes would be enhanced by the use of more relevant examples. Powerpoint slides were suggested as an alternative to the use of an overhead during lectures.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 31
Session: Winter 2006 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 96.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000134327175.47
Evaluations 003243128145.24
Organization 000203033175.47
Explanations 000102148215.79
Enthusiasm 000102037335.93
Teaching 000103337205.67
Workload 00031343135.07
Difficulty 00014394345.36
Value 000213625185.39
Retake Yes: 60.7%   No: 39.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor J. Lanshe to be an approachable professor who brings a plethora of experience and examples to his lectures. Students also stated that Professor Lanshe was enthusiastic and always willing to address questions and concerns of students. Some students did express concern on the level of difficulty of the course material however overall the course was thought to be an enjoyable experience.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 44
Session: Fall 2005 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 84.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 30620313465.03
Evaluations 1131723261464.14
Organization 303143431145.29
Explanations 300152635215.50
Enthusiasm 30391746235.66
Teaching 30615353565.09
Workload 030263126145.20
Difficulty 00361933396.00
Value 336161928255.28
Retake Yes: 32.3%   No: 67.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students were unclear as to what was expected on the assignments, midterms, and exams. Many felt that the evaluation was unjustifiably tough. Students also commented that some of the lecture material was out of date.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 49
Session: Winter 2005 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 91.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 02222492224.93
Evaluations 22032342454.85
Organization 03510383885.25
Explanations 035103833135.30
Enthusiasm 30384038105.35
Teaching 050124627105.20
Workload 000232033255.60
Difficulty 00252629385.95
Value 303222525225.31
Retake Yes: 52.5%   No: 47.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students express a sense that Professor Lansche was a caring and engaged instructor who was interested in their success. Some felt, however, that her limited availability was a problem at times.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 34
Session: Fall 2004 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 88.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 03310384505.17
Evaluations 302110382804.62
Organization 03017453135.10
Explanations 030212834145.31
Enthusiasm 03310344535.24
Teaching 303173431105.14
Workload 00419383185.19
Difficulty 00084219315.73
Value 00032243685.20
Retake Yes: 40.0%   No: 60.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students acknowledge that Professor Lansche communicates concepts clearly and coherently, however some felt that there was no reasonable chance to obtain participation marks.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 20
Session: Fall 2003 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 100.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 505104515205.20
Evaluations 550104025155.10
Organization 050104025205.40
Explanations 505103525205.20
Enthusiasm 05053020405.80
Teaching 0510103525155.10
Workload 000155010255.40
Difficulty 000203025255.60
Value 005291723235.30
Retake Yes: 50.0%   No: 50.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 54
Session: Winter 2003 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 72.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002213128155.18
Evaluations 00215363675.11
Organization 000102347185.63
Explanations 00201358255.94
Enthusiasm 00021351326.03
Teaching 00023248165.68
Workload 000372421165.06
Difficulty 000212427275.55
Value 000164032125.40
Retake Yes: 64.0%   No: 35.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found the instructor for this course to be excellent. Lansche's use of examples was helpful and made the course less difficult.


MGTD60H: Auditing
Instructor: Lansche, J. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2002 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 94.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 241217441564.70
Evaluations 641735231064.22
Organization 02626421784.94
Explanations 249113623155.04
Enthusiasm 006173630115.23
Teaching 04928361584.73
Workload 022273715175.12
Difficulty 000171529385.83
Value 0210322022154.99
Retake Yes: 31.0%   No: 69.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Lansche prepared students for the real world. He incorporated real-life examples with course materials.


What do the numbers mean?