Anti-Calendar



2 surveys for MATC16

MATC16H: Coding Theory and Cryptography
Instructor: Pete, G. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L30 Percent Response: 41.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 1515154300153.57
Evaluations 15151529015153.86
Organization 294301501502.57
Explanations 2929150151502.86
Enthusiasm 2901515029154.00
Teaching 15152915015153.71
Workload 000581515154.86
Difficulty 000154315295.57
Value 00152943004.33
Retake Yes: 28.6%   No: 71.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
While students appreciated Professors Pete's teaching, many felt his lectures were confusing at times, and suggested that lecture notes need to be more organized. To improve the course, they advised that the professor should write more clearly when writing on the board. The class also suggested replacing the project with assignments, and that exam information be provided beforehand.


MATC16H: Coding Theory and Cryptography
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 53.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0221122222204.11
Evaluations 002244022114.56
Organization 441133011002.22
Explanations 2525131325002.88
Enthusiasm 01111113311224.89
Teaching 11223311111103.22
Workload 0033670003.67
Difficulty 001144222204.56
Value 00011560335.56
Retake Yes: 87.5%   No: 12.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course had concerns with the tone of instruction and felt that greater moderation would benefit the classroom environment. While most found the course and the material to be valuable, as well as challenging, a more collegial atmosphere would have been beneficial.


What do the numbers mean?