Anti-Calendar



2 surveys for MATB61

MATB61H: Linear Programming and Optimization
Instructor: Valko, B. Course Enrollment: 56
Session: Winter 2006 Lecture: 30 Percent Response: 64.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 331129292334.57
Evaluations 30037232994.97
Organization 692020202334.20
Explanations 662023202064.29
Enthusiasm 69926311734.31
Teaching 36331262934.69
Workload 3311699603.94
Difficulty 6696314303.83
Value 03343261794.77
Retake Yes: 84.8%   No: 15.2%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course report a large portion of the class relied heavily on the text rather than lectures, in part because lectures were following the text closely in any case. The suggest Professor Valko's handwriting was an issue on the board and propose more use of overheads to alleviate this.


MATB61H: Linear Programming and Optimization
Instructor: Hill, P. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 53.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 13006020333.97
Evaluations 371033331034.30
Organization 133233717703.60
Explanations 103134327303.83
Enthusiasm 107233323033.67
Teaching 310143434303.97
Workload 002043231034.33
Difficulty 03174727704.17
Value 040194115225.30
Retake Yes: 65.5%   No: 34.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt this instructor relied too heavily on the material from the text without additional clarification. Also, some found his lectures hard to follow and the grading of assignments to be excessively delayed. Some felt he might benefit from additional preparation and organization, but several also noted improvements in these areas by the end of the year.


What do the numbers mean?