Anti-Calendar



9 surveys for MATB24

MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Moore, E. Course Enrollment: 66
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 37.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00812403285.20
Evaluations 00812443245.12
Organization 048242428125.00
Explanations 088242820124.80
Enthusiasm 0012162820245.28
Teaching 00816363645.12
Workload 00044322404.80
Difficulty 00428402444.96
Value 004402420124.96
Retake Yes: 62.5%   No: 37.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
The majority of students' comments reflect on Professor Moore's writing, which many found difficult to follow and decipher. One student even observed this has been reported in earlier Anti-Calendars but unfortunately the issue persists. Other than this complaint, however, students were pleased with Professor Moore's performance as an instructor and had no deeper concerns.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Sastry, P. Course Enrollment: 47
Session: Summer 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 59.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 40432283204.76
Evaluations 04432203284.96
Organization 001224322844.88
Explanations 016824282044.40
Enthusiasm 0128242016204.80
Teaching 001624242884.88
Workload 0007220084.44
Difficulty 00452241284.68
Value 40174392604.30
Retake Yes: 60.0%   No: 40.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Zhao, L. Course Enrollment: 97
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 47.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 02730332444.83
Evaluations 20038272944.91
Organization 0514342511114.59
Explanations 052034209114.43
Enthusiasm 221136301174.50
Teaching 021432341454.57
Workload 5205730524.27
Difficulty 5224530974.48
Value 202382619124.90
Retake Yes: 66.7%   No: 33.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Zhao to be a good instructor. They strongly felt, however, that he should give examples and notes that are not directly taken from the textbook. They would also appreciate if he wrote larger and clearer on the board.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 72
Session: Summer 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 80.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00094140105.52
Evaluations 000123634175.57
Organization 00272647195.74
Explanations 000104031195.59
Enthusiasm 000173133195.53
Teaching 000112539265.81
Workload 00055281164.68
Difficulty 00044351844.82
Value 02047311824.69
Retake Yes: 58.7%   No: 41.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students were pleased with the clear and applicable examples in this course and with Professor Cheredeko's instruction generally.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Cheredeko, N. Course Enrollment: 96
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 84.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00073540165.70
Evaluations 00182947125.60
Organization 00022541306.00
Explanations 00062641255.90
Enthusiasm 00072146245.90
Teaching 00062644225.80
Workload 00027382395.20
Difficulty 000253028155.40
Value 015232923165.20
Retake Yes: 51.0%   No: 48.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Cheredeko did not have a single bad comment regarding her teaching style, organization of the course, and willingness to help. A lot of students thought she is the best professor they have ever had. The course itself is hard, but the weekly quizzes and assignments helped a lot. Two hour tutorials were very long, but helped most of the students in understanding the material.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 105
Session: Fall 2002 Section: 2 Percent Response: 33.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 1821153312002.97
Evaluations 9189466903.40
Organization 41162993002.11
Explanations 2521211512302.68
Enthusiasm 181228286333.07
Teaching 252212299002.66
Workload 003313710174.97
Difficulty 300323516124.86
Value 14314487733.52
Retake Yes: 39.0%   No: 60.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students did not like the early lecture and found that it affects the level of enthusiasm for the class. Students suggest that the instructor structure and prepare the lecture better, so that the learning experience in the lecture is enhanced.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Moore, E. Course Enrollment: 28
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 1 Percent Response: 96.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0004266375.70
Evaluations 00041567155.98
Organization 00441944305.97
Explanations 00041548336.10
Enthusiasm 00001544416.26
Teaching 00001959226.03
Workload 00541272354.87
Difficulty 005383810104.87
Value 006173333115.26
Retake Yes: 62.0%   No: 38.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Mendelsohn, E. Course Enrollment: 119
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 2 Percent Response: 11.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 1401436714144.20
Evaluations 77729291474.36
Organization 2171421210143.64
Explanations 7141436140143.89
Enthusiasm 700212929145.08
Teaching 7141421217144.06
Workload 00757211404.38
Difficulty 00050291474.78
Value 01010501010104.30
Retake Yes: 70.0%   No: 30.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt that it was evident Mendelsohn was knowledgable. However, lectures were very difficult to follow.


MATB24H: Linear Algebra II
Instructor: Moore, E. Course Enrollment: 100
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 2 Percent Response: 51.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0026404485.50
Evaluations 000143836125.46
Organization 00262646205.76
Explanations 00263440185.66
Enthusiasm 002122628325.76
Teaching 00243242205.74
Workload 00050281664.78
Difficulty 00044341844.82
Value 0226192324.51
Retake Yes: 58.0%   No: 42.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Moore was described by students as a very organized lecturer who made an 8am lecture very bearable. His version of assignment solutions were excellent and he gave good examples in class. The one major complaint was that the midterm was too long.


What do the numbers mean?