Anti-Calendar



4 surveys for LGGA50

LGGA50H: Introductory Latin I
Instructor: , . Course Enrollment: 18
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 83.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00004047145.73
Evaluations 00001454346.20
Organization 00074720205.57
Explanations 00004040205.80
Enthusiasm 00001434546.40
Teaching 0000760346.27
Workload 000342020275.40
Difficulty 0014204014144.93
Value 0007734476.29
Retake Yes: 93.0%   No: 7.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students found Professor Newman to be an excellent instructor, who was very knowledgeable and enthusiastic about Latin. Students appreciated his humour and historical notes that allowed such tough material to be grasped more easily. They also appreciated his continued encouragement and ability to answer questions thoroughly and in a timely manner. One concern students had about the course was that it was a lot of tough material to learn in six weeks. One suggestion students have for Professor Newman is to write on the board in a more organized fashion.


LGGA50H: Introductory Latin I
Instructor: , . Course Enrollment: 18
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 83.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00004047145.73
Evaluations 00001454346.20
Organization 00074720205.57
Explanations 00004040205.80
Enthusiasm 00001434546.40
Teaching 0000760346.27
Workload 000342020275.40
Difficulty 0014204014144.93
Value 0007734476.29
Retake Yes: 93.0%   No: 7.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students found Professor Newman to be an excellent lecturer, who was quite knowledgeable about Latin and its uses throughout history. They appreciated the fact that he graded fairly within a short amount of time and gave appropriate feedback where needed. They also appreciated that he never hesitated to answer questions and always made himself available for consultation through various means. One concern students had about the course was that the tough content was hard to learn in only six weeks. One suggestion students have for Professor Newman is that weekly quizzes should have been provided as a better judge of understanding.


LGGA50H: Introductory Latin I
Instructor: Hamonic, N. Course Enrollment: 29
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 93.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00041245236.05
Evaluations 0004841306.18
Organization 00081530306.00
Explanations 00041230346.19
Enthusiasm 00001223496.45
Teaching 00001526416.32
Workload 00030193045.09
Difficulty 00426261985.00
Value 000151523195.63
Retake Yes: 90.0%   No: 10.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Hamonic to be helpful and enthusiastic. They also appreciated that she was able to present difficult material in a simplistic and logical fashion.


LGGA50H: Introductory Latin I
Instructor: Bevan, G. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Summer 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 64.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00002846286.00
Evaluations 0000055466.45
Organization 000101937376.00
Explanations 00002837376.09
Enthusiasm 00001028646.55
Teaching 00001055376.27
Workload 0010551910104.55
Difficulty 00046460104.73
Value 00004619195.67
Retake Yes: 100.0%   No: 0.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students commented that Professor Bevan's enthusiasm and background knowledge about the material made this course an enriching experience. Nonetheless, some students found the course material to be rather challenging.


What do the numbers mean?