Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for ECMC27

ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Furlong, K. Course Enrollment: 27
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 48.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000161654165.69
Evaluations 00160854245.69
Organization 00882439245.62
Explanations 08882424315.38
Enthusiasm 0800854315.92
Teaching 00024847245.69
Workload 000311639165.38
Difficulty 00082447245.85
Value 00016039245.90
Retake Yes: 61.5%   No: 38.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thoroughly enjoyed Professor Furlong's class. They found him to be an outstanding professor with the ability to convey the course material in an efficient manner.


ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Parker, I. Course Enrollment: 19
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 57.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00004628285.82
Evaluations 00003728376.00
Organization 0100191928285.36
Explanations 000102828375.91
Enthusiasm 00001037556.45
Teaching 000102810556.09
Workload 000283728105.18
Difficulty 000461919195.09
Value 00001928105.83
Retake Yes: 78.0%   No: 22.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Parker, I. Course Enrollment: 31
Session: Winter 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 74.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0009592395.32
Evaluations 0055414195.45
Organization 001814412704.77
Explanations 055141445185.45
Enthusiasm 00051841366.09
Teaching 00092252175.78
Workload 000183236145.45
Difficulty 00026353545.17
Value 00093530265.74
Retake Yes: 52.4%   No: 47.6%
calendar, timetable Comments
Some students enjoyed the online readings, while others preferred having a textbook. Many found the readings to be heavy and the assignments to be difficult. Otherwise, the class agreed that Professor Parker was a very passionate professor and communicated his knowledge with enthusiasm, thus making the course experience worthwhile. They appreciated him allowing students to choose research topics of their interest.


ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Parker, I. Course Enrollment: 32
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 56.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 006222828175.28
Evaluations 000222833175.44
Organization 6617222211174.50
Explanations 00033396225.17
Enthusiasm 00061139446.22
Teaching 006113328225.50
Workload 000333917115.06
Difficulty 00017443365.28
Value 006223322175.22
Retake Yes: 52.9%   No: 47.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students noted Professor I. Parker to be extremely knowledgeable and accommodating to students with questions. Students also felt Professor I. Parker was very enthusiastic. Most students felt that tutorials were very useful and beneficial to the course. Overall, most students enjoyed this course and instructor.


ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Parker, I. Course Enrollment: 21
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 66.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002873514144.69
Evaluations 0703505075.03
Organization 140721351474.27
Explanations 14700422874.55
Enthusiasm 7700750285.52
Teaching 7077284274.97
Workload 00003514506.09
Difficulty 00073514425.81
Value 1200251225254.97
Retake Yes: 53.0%   No: 46.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found the tutorials for this course were a great aid in understanding the course material. Also, students found that there was a lot of reading required. Professor Parker was found to be a genuinely kind and sincere professor, however, lecture notes can sometimes be untidy and difficult to understand.


ECMC27H: Classics in the History of Economic Thought
Instructor: Parker, I. Course Enrollment: 21
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 100.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00025502505.00
Evaluations 0088335005.21
Organization 00173342804.41
Explanations 00825254205.01
Enthusiasm 00092736275.76
Teaching 00017255085.49
Workload 0000643605.36
Difficulty 0009731805.09
Value 00027362795.13
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found that getting information from a book would have been better than the online materials used this past year.


What do the numbers mean?