Anti-Calendar



8 surveys for CSCD18

CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Sigal, L. Course Enrollment: 9
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 55.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0000208005.80
Evaluations 0000406005.60
Organization 00004040205.80
Explanations 000202020405.80
Enthusiasm 00004040205.80
Teaching 0000406005.60
Workload 0000600405.80
Difficulty 00006020205.60
Value 000204020205.40
Retake Yes: 60.0%   No: 40.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Unfortunately, no comments were available for this course.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Jansen, C. Course Enrollment: 11
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 54.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000175017175.33
Evaluations 00050034175.17
Organization 00017670175.17
Explanations 000175017175.33
Enthusiasm 000173434175.50
Teaching 00017670175.17
Workload 0017171734175.17
Difficulty 000341717345.50
Value 0001767004.80
Retake Yes: 50.0%   No: 50.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Unfortunately, sufficient comments were not available for this course.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Fleet, D. Course Enrollment: 32
Session: Fall 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 46.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0000747476.40
Evaluations 00703313475.93
Organization 0000747476.40
Explanations 00001340476.33
Enthusiasm 00001327606.47
Teaching 0000743506.43
Workload 0070207305.60
Difficulty 0007295775.64
Value 00714294375.29
Retake Yes: 100.0%   No: 0.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students enjoyed Professor Fleet's enthusiasm and down to earth nature. Some expressed concerns surrounding assignment deadlines, but commented favourably about the professor and the course material.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Fleet, D. Course Enrollment: 25
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 28.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00001471146.00
Evaluations 001401457145.57
Organization 0014142929145.14
Explanations 000291443145.43
Enthusiasm 00001750336.17
Teaching 001401457145.57
Workload 000291443145.43
Difficulty 00004343145.71
Value 0014142914295.29
Retake Yes: 71.4%   No: 28.6%
calendar, timetable No Comments


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Fleet, D. Course Enrollment: 38
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 68.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00043252125.72
Evaluations 000123240165.60
Organization 000161648205.72
Explanations 000162444165.60
Enthusiasm 0000428686.64
Teaching 0004848406.24
Workload 000131330436.04
Difficulty 00042239356.04
Value 04030173995.13
Retake Yes: 60.9%   No: 39.1%
calendar, timetable Comments
Most students in this course indicate that it was fun and useful for them. They found Professor Fleet quite knowledgeable but also felt his lectures went too quickly to absorb adequately. Students stressed the importance of a solid foundation going into this course.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Fleet, D. Course Enrollment: 17
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 82.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0077757215.79
Evaluations 007142936145.36
Organization 00002136436.21
Explanations 00002921506.21
Enthusiasm 000077866.79
Teaching 00002143366.14
Workload 00003154155.85
Difficulty 0000838546.46
Value 00017255085.50
Retake Yes: 92.3%   No: 7.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course were quite positive about their experience and about the instruction they received. Some felt the midterm did not reflect the material they had learned to that point.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Jansen, C. Course Enrollment: 84
Session: Fall 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 33.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00325481834.78
Evaluations 00337441134.64
Organization 001125481404.57
Explanations 00824402804.88
Enthusiasm 03342341504.43
Teaching 00725511404.60
Workload 000223322225.39
Difficulty 000112334305.73
Value 1002520251554.15
Retake Yes: 25.0%   No: 75.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found that the class examples as well as examples in the course readings could be more elaborate and detailed. Some expressed that the course could have benefited with software examples instead of low-res pictures. Many found Jansen to be excellent one on one and many found the course quite challenging. Some students expressed that the midterm was very difficult.


CSCD18H: Computer Graphics
Instructor: Jansen, C. Course Enrollment: 72
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 1 Percent Response: 48.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 33921352634.70
Evaluations 30615382995.08
Organization 336152932125.08
Explanations 33932153264.73
Enthusiasm 000153826215.53
Teaching 001212383535.05
Workload 30324382495.05
Difficulty 30324392194.92
Value 013821331784.57
Retake Yes: 60.0%   No: 40.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students did not feel Jansen taught effectively. Lectures seemed to go too fast and examples were not clear. Also, the readings were described as unclear and concepts were not explained well.


What do the numbers mean?