Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for CSCB63

CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Estrada, F. Course Enrollment: 34
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 67.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000143540145.52
Evaluations 000144031185.52
Organization 50514482295.00
Explanations 00514531895.14
Enthusiasm 00552240315.87
Teaching 000143135225.65
Workload 00531313155.00
Difficulty 000312731145.26
Value 00522184405.15
Retake Yes: 63.6%   No: 36.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt that professor Estrada was a good professor; however, they found that his notes lacked organization.


CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Bretscher, A. Course Enrollment: 27
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 92.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0004864166.00
Evaluations 00082040245.87
Organization 0004832486.35
Explanations 00041244326.13
Enthusiasm 00041636366.13
Teaching 0004844366.22
Workload 000162029295.74
Difficulty 000162420325.74
Value 000161616205.59
Retake Yes: 48.0%   No: 52.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Bretscher to be very patient with students and she takes the time to ensure students understand the topics discussed. A few students noted that more examples should be used to demonstrate concepts.


CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Bretscher, A. Course Enrollment: 13
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000131338386.00
Evaluations 001302550135.50
Organization 00002525506.25
Explanations 00003825386.00
Enthusiasm 00001350386.25
Teaching 00001338386.29
Workload 000131338255.86
Difficulty 00001313636.57
Value 00013382505.17
Retake Yes: 28.6%   No: 71.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Generally, students praised Professor Bretscher's performance. They noted that her method of teaching and well-organized lecture slides made the course material easy to grasp. However, some students thought that the instructor could have provided more examples and that the midterms were not fairly graded.


CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Molloy, M. Course Enrollment: 47
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 771129182904.29
Evaluations 1141526221574.19
Organization 1171421251474.14
Explanations 4111425251844.25
Enthusiasm 1141519192674.37
Teaching 1141125321174.25
Workload 444213221144.96
Difficulty 44421732295.36
Value 74733222244.41
Retake Yes: 37.0%   No: 63.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found this course and the material very challenging and a number of comments suggest Professor Molloy was not as successful as he might have been at 'bringing it down' to an undergraduate level. Various suggestions include more detailed notes, clearer expectations regarding assignments, and more connection between the grading TA and work performed in class. A few students also suggest Professor Molloy was not sufficiently available outside of the classroom. His knowledge and experience was widely acknowledged, but students felt they weren't able to profit from it as much as they would have liked.


CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Bretscher, A. Course Enrollment: 28
Session: Summer 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 92.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00042746235.88
Evaluations 00443546125.58
Organization 00003527386.04
Explanations 000121542315.92
Enthusiasm 00042735356.00
Teaching 00002844286.00
Workload 00882044205.60
Difficulty 00081531466.15
Value 881231191584.23
Retake Yes: 28.0%   No: 72.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Everyone who commented was very appreciative of Professor Bretscher's enthusiasm for teaching. She was noted as being readily available outside of class hours through office hours and e-mail. The difficulty of assignments was above average but this was mitigated in part by the level of accessibility to the professor.


CSCB63H: Design and Analysis of Data Structures
Instructor: Cheng, N. Course Enrollment: 64
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 75.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000194821135.27
Evaluations 04442311544.60
Organization 002173133175.46
Explanations 002192342155.48
Enthusiasm 000151933335.85
Teaching 024253323135.08
Workload 002274021105.10
Difficulty 022132345155.51
Value 971737171123.89
Retake Yes: 46.7%   No: 53.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course were positive about the instruction but felt their TAs were inexperienced and not an asset to the course. Additionally, more feedback on assignments would have been appreciated.


What do the numbers mean?