Anti-Calendar



8 surveys for CSCB09

CSCB09H: Software Tools and Systems Programming
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 48
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 50.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00025422595.17
Evaluations 55017422594.96
Organization 05521253895.13
Explanations 00913502195.08
Enthusiasm 00991346255.71
Teaching 00913383855.17
Workload 00921461394.91
Difficulty 005253817135.09
Value 055342517134.87
Retake Yes: 78.3%   No: 21.7%
calendar, timetable No Comments


CSCB09H: Software Tools and Systems Programming
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 35
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 82.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 07014353575.14
Evaluations 07421422144.79
Organization 07428282844.79
Explanations 044142838115.29
Enthusiasm 07002832325.75
Teaching 04018422875.14
Workload 00428352845.00
Difficulty 04028422144.89
Value 00021321875.14
Retake Yes: 78.0%   No: 22.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Szamosi was able to explain concepts clearly in lectures. However some students found the course structure was somewhat unorganized. Many students said they would like the lecture notes to be posted ahead of time, and have their assignments back in a timely manner.


CSCB09H: Software Tools and Systems Programming
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 26
Session: Winter 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000193831135.38
Evaluations 000193125255.56
Organization 002519133864.81
Explanations 061919311964.56
Enthusiasm 000131350255.88
Teaching 0013133125195.25
Workload 00031253865.19
Difficulty 00650191964.69
Value 137733201374.07
Retake Yes: 78.6%   No: 21.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Szamosi to be very approachable. However, many students would have liked it if assignments were marked and returned in a reasonable time and if lecture notes should be posted before lecture.


CSCB09H: Software Tools and Systems Programming
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 36
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 72.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 04435233504.81
Evaluations 00827313504.92
Organization 4121235231244.12
Explanations 44153535804.15
Enthusiasm 000233815235.38
Teaching 04827421904.65
Workload 004382323125.00
Difficulty 00435352344.88
Value 4403542884.62
Retake Yes: 84.0%   No: 16.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Some students felt Professor Szamosi's lectures lacked enthusiasm. Overall students noted Professor Szamosi to be extremely knowledgeable, students also addressed concerns with the assignments given throughout the course, primarily the timeline of these assignments. Overall students agree that with a strong organizational structure and clear-cut direction this course has the potential to be a favourite among students.


CSCB09H: Software Tools and System Programming
Instructor: Harper, J. Course Enrollment: 71
Session: Winter 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 40.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 300102438245.62
Evaluations 30372828315.62
Organization 30302141315.83
Explanations 303102434245.52
Enthusiasm 30031441386.00
Teaching 30003138285.79
Workload 00050212544.82
Difficulty 00754291104.43
Value 000242828215.45
Retake Yes: 96.3%   No: 3.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students appreciated Professor Harper's detailed notes and saw a great deal of value in the material. Some commented the two-hour lectures went quite slowly without a break.


CSCB09H: Software Tools and Systems Programming
Instructor: Harper, J. Course Enrollment: 120
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 35.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000171936295.76
Evaluations 000122633295.79
Organization 202211426335.57
Explanations 00572633295.74
Enthusiasm 00271936365.95
Teaching 002101736365.93
Workload 002292927125.17
Difficulty 00541272074.83
Value 035182321315.46
Retake Yes: 92.5%   No: 7.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students' comments were varied, but almost universally positive about Professor Harper.


CSCB09H: Methods and Tools for Software Development
Instructor: Harper, J. Course Enrollment: 101
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 54.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00013340245.77
Evaluations 00012645265.86
Organization 00003129385.95
Explanations 00152038335.82
Enthusiasm 00032233406.00
Teaching 00032450225.86
Workload 00036302754.91
Difficulty 00049272034.72
Value 000112734275.72
Retake Yes: 93.0%   No: 6.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Assignments in this class were very useful and practical. He provided excellent help during office hours and always seemed to be available for help. Students also found they had deeper understanding of Microsoft after taking this class.


CSCB09H: Methods and Tools for Softwar Development
Instructor: Harper, J. Course Enrollment: 132
Session: Winter 2002 Section: 1 Percent Response: 52.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 002152138245.70
Evaluations 005142237235.64
Organization 003141732345.80
Explanations 002231526345.67
Enthusiasm 00292528375.94
Teaching 002122029375.87
Workload 00036273085.15
Difficulty 00244351454.76
Value 002172226335.71
Retake Yes: 83.0%   No: 17.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students felt Harper was a great instructor and answered questions effectively. Students also felt the course was practical and interesting. Some students mentioned that tutorials were not that effective.


What do the numbers mean?