Anti-Calendar



9 surveys for CSCB07

CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Pancer, R. Course Enrollment: 69
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 59.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 005204418105.08
Evaluations 083302522104.85
Organization 033204418105.05
Explanations 005273222105.05
Enthusiasm 003182730205.49
Teaching 033273025105.05
Workload 8384427334.05
Difficulty 5834222834.14
Value 508221813104.67
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Most students felt that the professor taught effectively but suggested returning assignments in a timely manner.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Pancer, R. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 66.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 30324322985.05
Evaluations 33622372464.84
Organization 600293519114.88
Explanations 303194816115.03
Enthusiasm 300223724145.19
Teaching 33322322964.94
Workload 33345241634.50
Difficulty 30853141634.38
Value 00632272204.75
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Unfortunately, sufficient comments were not available for this course.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Pancer, R. Course Enrollment: 31
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000223237115.37
Evaluations 006164322165.26
Organization 00022165865.47
Explanations 00062753165.79
Enthusiasm 000163727225.53
Teaching 000163727225.53
Workload 06113748004.26
Difficulty 00115337004.26
Value 00062243165.81
Retake Yes: 83.3%   No: 16.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students deemed Professor Pancer to be an excellent and enthusiastic instructor; they felt that he was both an effective communicator and appreciated that he was well-organized. Moreover, students found his lectures to be enjoyable. Nonetheless, some students noted that the course assignments should have been more promptly returned.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 25
Session: Summer 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 48.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 001725349174.83
Evaluations 00025422595.17
Organization 002534179174.58
Explanations 009342517175.00
Enthusiasm 000173434175.50
Teaching 00042349175.00
Workload 0004250904.67
Difficulty 0006734004.33
Value 0094225094.50
Retake Yes: 75.0%   No: 25.0%
calendar, timetable No Comments


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 30
Session: Fall 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 66.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 005112642165.53
Evaluations 005211632265.53
Organization 0011263716114.89
Explanations 0021111637165.16
Enthusiasm 000211132375.84
Teaching 000261642165.47
Workload 00050222804.78
Difficulty 001144281704.50
Value 51121261611114.11
Retake Yes: 89.5%   No: 10.5%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students saw Professor Szamosi as an enthusiastic instructor, whose passion for the course material was evident in his teaching. Several students commented that more examples are needed for a better understanding of the course material.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 41
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 65.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000333715155.11
Evaluations 00411563005.11
Organization 0011263319114.93
Explanations 00031508125.00
Enthusiasm 00483527275.65
Teaching 000264815115.11
Workload 000193730155.41
Difficulty 00042421244.77
Value 47744191544.26
Retake Yes: 73.1%   No: 26.9%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students indicated that Professor Szamosi should show more enthusiasm in lecture, and expressed a need for marks to be returned in a shorter amount of time. Although the amount of assignments was large, students commented that the work itself was not very difficult.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 22
Session: Winter 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 22.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00206020004.00
Evaluations 02006020003.80
Organization 00252550004.25
Explanations 00200602004.80
Enthusiasm 00020404005.20
Teaching 00020404005.20
Workload 0002080004.80
Difficulty 0004060004.60
Value 002020402004.60
Retake Yes: 80.0%   No: 20.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course felt that attempts to harmonize the course with those occurring on other campuses worked to their disadvantage and bound them to rigid schedules. More flexibility was requested.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 60
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 58.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00941262404.65
Evaluations 0012242924125.00
Organization 302132182434.44
Explanations 091239122434.39
Enthusiasm 366152629155.03
Teaching 031829123534.68
Workload 00338252864.97
Difficulty 06048242104.55
Value 710747131334.03
Retake Yes: 67.7%   No: 32.3%
calendar, timetable Comments
Some students felt Professor Szamosi did not have an adequate handle on the content of this course and relied too heavily on external direction and prepared notes.


CSCB07H: Software Design
Instructor: Szamosi, M. Course Enrollment: 79
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 45.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 22825253124.70
Evaluations 20831371454.70
Organization 52817372804.60
Explanations 20516413304.90
Enthusiasm 20219333655.10
Teaching 50814452224.70
Workload 00062121516.20
Difficulty 036241833155.20
Value 3121215242764.50
Retake Yes: 67.0%   No: 32.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students thought the course was difficult, and that they were rushed on the assignments. They felt the course would be better if it was not taught in collaboration with the other two campuses. Better tutorials would also improve the learning experience.


What do the numbers mean?