Anti-Calendar



8 surveys for CHMC42

CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Mikhaylichenko, S. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 64.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00063330305.86
Evaluations 00392236305.83
Organization 00003333336.00
Explanations 00003033366.06
Enthusiasm 00002830416.14
Teaching 00002246306.08
Workload 00093628285.75
Difficulty 00062228446.11
Value 00025382595.17
Retake Yes: 53.0%   No: 47.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Potter was responsible for the lab portion of this course, and many students found the labs to be disorganized. Students stated that the marking scheme was very vague, so they did not know what the expectations of the lab reports were. Also, they found the course load of the lecture and lab to be very difficult to manage, and they would prefer it if these two parts were separated into two courses. However, students found the labs to be very interesting, but improving the organization of the labs would have made their learning experiences better.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Mikhaylichenko, S. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 64.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00063330305.86
Evaluations 00392236305.83
Organization 00003333336.00
Explanations 00003033366.06
Enthusiasm 00002830416.14
Teaching 00002246306.08
Workload 00093628285.75
Difficulty 00062228446.11
Value 00025382595.17
Retake Yes: 53.0%   No: 47.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The students found professor Mikhaylichenko to be an excellent and helpful professor. Students appreciated the professors? availability, even after her office hours, and her friendly personality. Many students also liked the fact that she truly cared about every student, and wanted to make sure that they understood the material and had a good learning experience. Overall, the professor was found to be very approachable and passionate about teaching this course.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Potter, J. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 56.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0161016292274.52
Evaluations 47722351974.65
Organization 44719352574.84
Explanations 0101329192274.52
Enthusiasm 410432221974.50
Teaching 44429321974.73
Workload 040133813295.50
Difficulty 040162922295.55
Value 07729357134.70
Retake Yes: 39.0%   No: 61.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Potter was responsible for the lab portion of this course, and many students found the labs to be disorganized. Students stated that the marking scheme was very vague, so they did not know what the expectations of the lab reports were. Also, they found the course load of the lecture and lab to be very difficult to manage, and they would prefer it if these two parts were separated into two courses. However, students found the labs to be very interesting, but improving the organization of the labs would have made their learning experiences better.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Potter, J. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 56.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0161016292274.52
Evaluations 47722351974.65
Organization 44719352574.84
Explanations 0101329192274.52
Enthusiasm 410432221974.50
Teaching 44429321974.73
Workload 040133813295.50
Difficulty 040162922295.55
Value 07729357134.70
Retake Yes: 39.0%   No: 61.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The students found professor Mikhaylichenko to be an excellent and helpful professor. Students appreciated the professors? availability, even after her office hours, and her friendly personality. Many students also liked the fact that she truly cared about every student, and wanted to make sure that they understood the material and had a good learning experience. Overall, the professor was found to be very approachable and passionate about teaching this course.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Mikhaylichenko, S. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 64.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00063330305.86
Evaluations 00392236305.83
Organization 00003333336.00
Explanations 00003033366.06
Enthusiasm 00002830416.14
Teaching 00002246306.08
Workload 00093628285.75
Difficulty 00062228446.11
Value 00025382595.17
Retake Yes: 53.0%   No: 47.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The students found professor Mikhaylichenko to be an excellent and helpful professor. Students appreciated the professorsí availability, even after her office hours, and her friendly personality. Many students also liked the fact that she truly cared about every student, and wanted to make sure that they understood the material and had a good learning experience. Overall, the professor was found to be very approachable and passionate about teaching this course.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Potter, J. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Winter 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 56.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0161016292274.52
Evaluations 47722351974.65
Organization 44719352574.84
Explanations 0101329192274.52
Enthusiasm 410432221974.50
Teaching 44429321974.73
Workload 040133813295.50
Difficulty 040162922295.55
Value 07729357134.70
Retake Yes: 39.0%   No: 61.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The students found professor Mikhaylichenko to be an excellent and helpful professor. Students appreciated the professorsí availability, even after her office hours, and her friendly personality. Many students also liked the fact that she truly cared about every student, and wanted to make sure that they understood the material and had a good learning experience. Overall, the professor was found to be very approachable and passionate about teaching this course.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Kandeephan, N. Course Enrollment: 85
Session: Winter 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 80.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 02393832175.45
Evaluations 003113341125.48
Organization 01463436185.52
Explanations 013102740185.55
Enthusiasm 013212827195.34
Teaching 20264135155.50
Workload 000302531135.28
Difficulty 000333122135.16
Value 251229252264.60
Retake Yes: 53.1%   No: 46.9%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students were very pleased with Professor Kandeephan and felt she was responsible and fair in her conduct of the class. Most criticism was reserved for the laboratory element of this course, with many students commenting they simply didn't have enough time to complete their experiments, and a surprising number of complaints directed towards one TA in particular, under-scoring the potential disparity between lab work with the 'good' TA vs. work with the 'bad' one.


CHMC42H: Organic Synthesis
Instructor: Tidwell, T. Course Enrollment: 19
Session: Winter 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 63.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00003342255.92
Evaluations 00017850255.83
Organization 00001742426.25
Explanations 00017833426.00
Enthusiasm 80081725425.67
Teaching 00002727456.18
Workload 000401020305.40
Difficulty 000271836185.45
Value 00036036275.55
Retake Yes: 63.6%   No: 36.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course were positive about Professor Tidwell's instruction, but suggested that the laboratory sections of this course were extremely difficult and might be improved in various ways.


What do the numbers mean?