Anti-Calendar



6 surveys for BGYC63

BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Manne, L. Course Enrollment: 39
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 74.4%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 000115228115.38
Evaluations 04025323845.10
Organization 00442856115.66
Explanations 00072552185.79
Enthusiasm 000111838355.97
Teaching 00401863185.90
Workload 000183832115.36
Difficulty 00042421174.83
Value 00425321144.81
Retake Yes: 67.0%   No: 33.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students thought Professor Manne made the course very interesting. They also agreed that she was very knowledgeable about the course material. One suggestion many students had for Professor Manne was to reconsider the mark breakdown for the course.


BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Bongard, C.L. Course Enrollment: 46
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 41.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 062732221164.21
Evaluations 66627436114.53
Organization 611222727663.95
Explanations 06653161164.38
Enthusiasm 06622163765.00
Teaching 0112222271664.32
Workload 00632372264.88
Difficulty 00658221164.53
Value 661132271104.12
Retake Yes: 36.7%   No: 63.2%
calendar, timetable No Comments


BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Manne, L. Course Enrollment: 27
Session: Fall 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 55.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 007201420205.33
Evaluations 007142027145.33
Organization 007202020145.17
Explanations 007142714205.33
Enthusiasm 000202014275.58
Teaching 000202014275.58
Workload 00714277275.42
Difficulty 00714407145.08
Value 70027271474.67
Retake Yes: 50.0%   No: 50.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Manne to be a very good instructor who took the time to ensure students understood the material and who was always ready and willing to assist. Nonetheless, many students felt the midterm in this course was rather long.


BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Manne, L. Course Enrollment: 49
Session: Fall 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 65.3%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 306102935165.32
Evaluations 0310192329165.13
Organization 300191335295.61
Explanations 300102639235.61
Enthusiasm 30061639355.90
Teaching 300101652195.68
Workload 000262632165.39
Difficulty 00348291364.71
Value 003193523195.35
Retake Yes: 63.3%   No: 36.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
Dr. Manne was praised for being a very enthusiastic instructor, approachable, friendly, knowledgeable and organized. However, a few students found the instructions for the assignments to be vague and the marking scheme to be tough. Students felt that more time for the midterm would be appreciated. On the other hand, Dr. Manne's teaching skills was very welcoming, caring and make an effort to keep her students interested.


BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Manne, L. Course Enrollment: 42
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 76.2%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 039282225134.94
Evaluations 001029163965.03
Organization 000223431135.34
Explanations 000193128225.53
Enthusiasm 000161931345.84
Teaching 003222828195.38
Workload 000343122135.13
Difficulty 00056251634.66
Value 663282513194.72
Retake Yes: 51.6%   No: 48.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Most students enjoyed Professor Manne's lectures and appreciated the effort she took to get to know all of her students. Many commented however that the instructions given on assignments were left to vague which impeded the ability to perform optimally on them. Exams were thought to be fair.


BGYC63H: Conservation Biology
Instructor: Manne, L. Course Enrollment: 39
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 61.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00817462185.04
Evaluations 00825332585.00
Organization 000172635225.61
Explanations 004212929175.33
Enthusiasm 004172133255.58
Teaching 008133321255.42
Workload 00036411494.95
Difficulty 0006126944.57
Value 00027412395.14
Retake Yes: 59.1%   No: 40.9%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this course noted that Professor Manne was quite nice and well-intentioned but they frequently felt lost in terms of assignments and course expectations. While extensions were forth-coming for assignments when necessary, students felt they would sooner the assignments were clearer in the first place and extensions not needed.


What do the numbers mean?