Anti-Calendar



10 surveys for BGYC15

BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 132
Session: Fall 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 48.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 22242130405.94
Evaluations 40442229385.84
Organization 20252421466.00
Explanations 20203019466.03
Enthusiasm 20401916586.23
Teaching 20401921546.18
Workload 204191529325.61
Difficulty 205251636155.24
Value 220241532185.35
Retake Yes: 59.0%   No: 41.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Overall, students thought Professor Hasenkampf was such an enjoyable and passionate instructor that students were willing to attend classes at 8 AM. Her lectures were organized, and she clearly stated the course expectations and also her expectations of students. In addition, her exams were marked fairly. However, most students thought the labs were very time-consuming and resulted in a heavy workload.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 31
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 67.7%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 005242420295.43
Evaluations 0524102915204.80
Organization 005202934155.33
Explanations 000152048205.71
Enthusiasm 000101020586.30
Teaching 000153420295.65
Workload 00554820245.52
Difficulty 0010202420295.38
Value 00524345205.11
Retake Yes: 65.0%   No: 35.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Many students felt Professor Hasenkampf is an asset to the University of Toronto teaching faculty. She communicates course material both creatively and enthusiastically. Students enjoyed the lab itself, and appreciated its importance to understanding course material better. Students also appreciated the online availability of the lecture, as that material can be quite heavy.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 119
Session: Summer 2008 Section: L01 Percent Response: 44.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 20042140295.90
Evaluations 220122329275.61
Organization 00402921426.02
Explanations 20001931426.14
Enthusiasm 00001021656.58
Teaching 20001231516.32
Workload 000162717365.78
Difficulty 002252327175.35
Value 200161929195.52
Retake Yes: 63.3%   No: 36.7%
calendar, timetable No Comments


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Sauer, M. Course Enrollment: 37
Session: Summer 2007 Section: 1 Percent Response: 67.6%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 04820243285.00
Evaluations 008242429125.13
Organization 80416362484.83
Explanations 488161629124.78
Enthusiasm 400241632205.33
Teaching 40820164044.96
Workload 000202024325.71
Difficulty 000202429205.52
Value 84829162004.19
Retake Yes: 54.2%   No: 45.8%
calendar, timetable Comments
A few students commented that the lab component of the course was demanding and that they would have appreciated it had the professor posted lecture notes prior to class. Otherwise, respondents felt that the instructor was very personable, and thoroughly explained the course material.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 139
Session: Fall 2006 Section: 1 Percent Response: 56.8%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00043239255.86
Evaluations 030123627225.52
Organization 00052639295.92
Explanations 00052437346.00
Enthusiasm 00011418666.49
Teaching 00112136406.13
Workload 00082638285.86
Difficulty 000173734125.41
Value 00334262995.06
Retake Yes: 66.2%   No: 33.8%
calendar, timetable Comments
Most students found the labs in this course to be very interesting and a great way to apply the course material, although some found them to be too lengthy and suggested improvements to make them more organized and structured. Some found that the teaching assistants did not provide sufficient guidance regarding the lab experiments and grading schemes. Many students also indicated interest in learning more molecular techniques during the labs. Many commented on the use of Powerpoint slides in some lectures. Most of the class noted that the use of overheads and the blackboard throughout class made the lectures more interactive. Regarding the midterm exam, students indicated preference for more short answer questions rather than multiple-choice questions that are worth a lot of points. Nevertheless, most students noted Professor Hasenkampf's high level of enthusiasm and energy. Many found her to be helpful and approachable. In the words of a student, 'The Professor'made it worthwhile to come [to lecture] at 8 am in the morning.'


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 137
Session: Fall 2005 Section: 1 Percent Response: 48.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00332243285.91
Evaluations 000142941175.61
Organization 002132236285.77
Explanations 002121834345.86
Enthusiasm 0005626636.48
Teaching 0009841426.17
Workload 000212731215.52
Difficulty 002163234165.47
Value 204392018185.00
Retake Yes: 72.3%   No: 27.7%
calendar, timetable Comments
They found Dr. Hasenkampf to be an enthusiastic professor and found her lectures to be engaging. She was very approachable especially during office hours. Students found the course to be challenging because of the intense lectures and lab component. Though time-consuming and tedious, most students enjoyed their lab experience in Genetics. It enabled them to relate to the genetic concepts taught in class. Some felt that they would benefit from a clearer marking scheme for the lab.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Douglas, S. Course Enrollment: 133
Session: Fall 2004 Section: 1 Percent Response: 57.9%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 40417462184.96
Evaluations 54736261394.50
Organization 111323317145.03
Explanations 304293416144.97
Enthusiasm 004302925125.11
Teaching 300242434155.28
Workload 000153032235.64
Difficulty 00052035396.08
Value 316221535185.21
Retake Yes: 48.6%   No: 51.4%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students in this class were very favorable towards Professor Douglas but suggested that his lectures would be easier to follow if he varied his materials and techniques more, perhaps involving powerpoint. Several students noted that the tests were unusually difficult.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 57
Session: Fall 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 54.0%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 0000336065.70
Evaluations 30030362364.90
Organization 00604124275.70
Explanations 000102346205.80
Enthusiasm 00061020636.40
Teaching 000102340265.80
Workload 000272424245.40
Difficulty 30001344345.60
Value 303263015195.00
Retake Yes: 71.0%   No: 28.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
The students requested that the lectures should focus more on the assigned problems from the textbooks and not so much on theory. The midterm was deemed too difficult and this discouraged many students. Some students suggested the course could benefit from the introduction of tutorials. Professor Hasenkampf herself was widely appreciated in this course.


BGYC15H: Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 38
Session: Winter 2003 Section: 1 Percent Response: 71.1%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 03073344115.40
Evaluations 00372642195.52
Organization 33301553195.44
Explanations 37002533295.43
Enthusiasm 00071930425.97
Teaching 30701146305.65
Workload 00025333385.19
Difficulty 000254516125.05
Value 404142333195.18
Retake Yes: 84.0%   No: 16.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Students found Professor Hasenkampf's lectures to be very interesting. She also gave helpful notes and clear explanations of the concepts.


BGYC15H: Transmission Genetics
Instructor: Hasenkampf, C. Course Enrollment: 63
Session: Fall 2001 Section: 1 Percent Response: 63.5%
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean
Communicates 00052348256.00
Evaluations 30382939185.49
Organization 00052349235.90
Explanations 00033239265.88
Enthusiasm 00031329556.36
Teaching 00031358266.07
Workload 000193232165.40
Difficulty 000113832195.59
Value 000242828215.51
Retake Yes: 71.0%   No: 29.0%
calendar, timetable Comments
Professor Hasenkampf was very friendly and enthusiastic about her material. Students enjoyed the laboratory component and felt it could have been worth more of the overall grade. Use of Powerpoint slides in lecture was also suggested. Although the material was interesting, the methods of evaluation were a little intense, such as the lab component combined with exams and tutorials placed a heavy workload on students.


What do the numbers mean?